Surprising results in the article Where's the remotest place on Earth? in New Scientist magazine summarized by this map: "less than 10 per cent of the world's land is more than 48 hours of ground-based travel from the nearest city."
Having traveled between Kathmandu, Nepal and Lhasa, Tibet (Tibet, like Greenland, looks very remote on the map), I'd note that the "ground-based travel" the article refers to must be by big, hearty vehicles.
Leaving Kathmandu by LandCruiser, we arrived at Xigatse, Tibet's second city, on the third day.
There's a larger map alongside the article itself.
(Map from New Scientist magazine.)
Having traveled between Kathmandu, Nepal and Lhasa, Tibet (Tibet, like Greenland, looks very remote on the map), I'd note that the "ground-based travel" the article refers to must be by big, hearty vehicles.
Leaving Kathmandu by LandCruiser, we arrived at Xigatse, Tibet's second city, on the third day.
There's a larger map alongside the article itself.
(Map from New Scientist magazine.)
Comments